![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Removing the need for reverse engineering and material testing. Is it an existing lifting device that has been in service for some time without material traceability or design documentation? Old or existing equipment without design of manufacturing documentation is generally easier to certify via testing. What is the size, WLL and type of equipment it is designed to lift? How accessible is suitable test equipment? Lifting devices designed to lift large, awkward or heavy equipment may require specialised equipment to be developed or procured to complete testing which can significantly increase the cost. Is it’s a one of device or something that will be serially manufactured? Serially manufactured equipment generally asks for a more optimised design to bring down production costs, leading to certification by design to be the preferred method. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |